H-1B Visa Abuse - How it Supresses US Wages - as IEEE-USA Sees It
Commentary:
The H-1B Visa Problem as IEEE-USA Sees It
By
Posted
As the
current, past and future Presidents of IEEE-USA, we read with interest your
article on H-1B visa pay [“H-1B Visas
by the Numbers,” IEEE
Spectrum, February 2017]. IEEE-USA has been actively working
with Congress to fix the H-1B visa program for well over a decade. Our
experience with the visa suggests that, while accurate, your article missed
some essential truths about the H-1B program.
For example,
you point out that, according to H1BPay.com, Facebook pays its software engineers
in Menlo Park, on average, US $138,294, which is a pretty good salary.
However, Smartorg pays
software engineers on H-1B visas in Menlo Park only $80,000 annually, which is
a ridiculously low salary for the San Jose region.
This
difference illustrates an important point about H-1B visas. While some
companies pay their H-1B employees’ salaries equivalent to what American
workers get paid, many companies do not. In fact, most H-1B visas are
used, not by Facebook and other big tech companies, but by outsourcing and
consulting companies.
And the
salaries paid by those companies tell a different story.
For example, Wipro,
a large outsourcing company, paid its 104 program analysts in San Jose exactly
$60,000 each in 2016. Brocade, in contrast, paid their programmer
analysts $130,000 in the same city.
Similarly,
Infosys, the largest user of H-1B visas, paid their 158 technology analysts in
New York City, one of the most expensive cities in the world, $67,832 on
average last year, not enough to rent a closet in that city.
A close look
at H1BPay.com’s
data shows that, as you move past the Googles and Microsofts of the IT world,
H-1B salaries tend to cluster around the $65,000 to $75,000 level. There
is a reason for this. If outsourcing companies pay their H-1B workers at
least $60,000, the company is exempted from a number of regulations designed to
prevent visa abuse.
But $60,000
is far below 2016 market rates for most tech jobs.
In 2014 (the
last year we have good data), Infosys, Cognizant, Wipro, and Tata Consultancy used
21,695 visas, or more than 25 percent of all private-sector H-1B visas
used that year. Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and Uber, for comparison,
used only 1,763 visas, or 2 percent.
What’s the
difference? Infosys, Cognizant, Wipro, and Tata are all outsourcing
companies. Their business model involves using H-1B visas to bring
low-cost workers into the United States and then renting those workers to other
companies. Their competitive advantage is price. That is, they make
their money by renting their workers for less than companies would have to pay
American workers.
This
is the real story of the H-1B visa. It is a tool used by companies to
avoid hiring American workers, and avoid paying American wages. For every
visa used by Google to hire a talented non-American for $126,000, ten Americans
are replaced by outsourcing companies paying their H-1B workers $65,000.
This is why,
IEEE-USA opposes efforts to expand the H-1B visa program.
In contrast,
IEEE-USA supports expanding green card programs to make it easier for skilled
non-Americans to become American citizens. Unlike H-1B workers, green card
holders are paid the same wages as Americans. If not, the green card
holders simply quit and find a better paying job—something H-1B workers
typically cannot do.
Green cards
and immigration, therefore, build our nation’s skilled labor pool and
strengthen our economy, while H-1Bs undermine both.
America was
built by green card holders, not guest workers.
About the
authors:
Karen
Pedersen is president, IEEE-USA; Peter
Eckstein is
past-president, IEEE-USA, and Sandra
“Candy” Robinson is
president-elect, IEEE-USA
Hey Thanks for sharing this blog its very helpful to implement in our work
ReplyDeleteRegards
LANDSCAPE COMPANY IN MUMBAI