Tiny Indian state proposes world's biggest experiment with guaranteed income
Tiny Indian state proposes world's biggest experiment
with guaranteed income
Niha Masih, The Washington Post Published 6:05 am CST,
Thursday, January 17, 2019
NEW DELHI - High in the Himalayas, Sikkim is one of the
tiniest states in India. But it is about to embark on an experiment of global
interest.
Sikkim's ruling party has announced an ambitious plan to
implement a universal basic income for every one of its 610,577 citizens.
If successful, the scheme would represent the largest
trial run anywhere in the world of a concept that supporters like Facebook's
Mark Zuckerberg say could provide a safety net, help alleviate poverty and
address the challenge of job automation. Detractors, meanwhile, say it would
reduce the incentive to work and would come at a huge expense.
A universal basic income is a regular, guaranteed income
paid by the government, universally and unconditionally, to all citizens. It is
a cash payment that aims to replace the often-confusing array of assistance
states offer to citizens and places spending decisions in the hands of the
recipients.
"If there is one chance of it happening anywhere, it
is Sikkim," said P.D. Rai, the sole member of India's parliament from the
state. Sikkim already has a progressive track record: it was one of the first
Indian states to ban plastic bags way back in 1998 - a ban that it has managed
to implement successfully unlike many other states. It has also provided
housing for all its citizens. Most recently, it became the country's first
organic state, eliminating the use of pesticides and fertilizers.
Its social indexes also stand out from the rest of the
country, with a literacy rate of 98 percent, and it has managed to
significantly bring the percentage of people living below the poverty line to
just about 8 percent - compared to nearly 30 percent nationally. Sikkim's small
geographic area and low population density have been responsible, in part, for
its success.
Rai acknowledges that there will be challenges.
"It's a matter of political will ultimately," he said. "With the
rise of global inequality, we want to ensure that we bridge the gap." Rai
declined to reveal how much the program, which was announced ahead of upcoming
elections this spring, would potentially cost the state. The tourism and power
sectors will be tapped to raise the resources. With over 2.5 million tourists
coming annually, tourism is a major source of revenue. Being a surplus power
generating state, Sikkim sells 90 percent of its hydropower. For now, he said,
the government is holding meetings with experts and stakeholders and expects to
roll out the scheme by 2022.
India has a large existing social security apparatus: the
central government alone spends 5 percent of GDP spent on 950 schemes. These
range from free rice, an allowance to build houses and even guaranteed
employment for some living in rural areas. But inefficient implementation and
diversion of funds due to corruption have long plagued the system, leading many
to propose a universal basic income as a possible solution. India's Economic
Survey for 2017 highlighted the concept as a "powerful idea" that
should be debated.
Elsewhere in the world, there have been several
small-scale experiments with implementing a universal basic income, but they
have met with limited success. In April 2017, the government of Ontario in
Canada announced a pilot project involving 4,000 people that would have cost
150 million Canadian dollars. The project ended abruptly for being
"expensive and unsustainable" after a year when the local government
changed.
In Finland, an experiment with universal basic income
similarly ended last year before its completion. The trial included a $630
monthly payment to 2,000 unemployed citizens.
In the United States, meanwhile, the concept has been
floated in Stockton, California by its young mayor. Last year, it announced that
100 residents would receive $500 a month for 18 months.
The notion of a universal basic income has found backers
in Silicon Valley, with tech moguls like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk
endorsing it. In his Harvard commencement address in 2017, Zuckerberg spoke of
the need for a "new social contract," with ideas like a basic income
to provide a "cushion" for everyone. Musk has described it as a
"necessary" step as automation takes over human jobs.
But economists have pointed to various possible pitfalls.
Some question whether giving cash instead of something like a food subsidy
would lead to spending on wasteful items. Plus as prices rise, a cash handout
would buy fewer goods. Others say a basic income would disincentivize work,
raising the possibility of a shrinking labor force.
Hailing Sikkim's initiative, Pranab Bardhan, an economist
at the University of California, Berkeley, said that the rationale behind a
universal basic income in a place like Sikkim is very different from a place
like Stockton.
"In developed countries, the main purpose is to
restructure or economize the existing welfare schemes, like unemployment
benefits," said Bardhan. "In low- or mid-income countries, like
India, the rationale will be to address the minimum economic insecurity of a
larger section of the population, not just the poorest, without touching the
existing anti-poverty measures."
Comments
Post a Comment