Facebook uses its apps to track users it thinks could threaten employees and offices (including Ex Employees)
- Get link
- Other Apps
Facebook uses its apps to track users it thinks
could threaten employees and offices
·
Facebook maintains a list of individuals that its security guards
must "be on lookout" for that is comprised of users who've made
threatening statements against the company on its social network as well as
numerous former employees.
·
The company's information security team is capable of tracking
these individuals' whereabouts using the location data they provide through
Facebook's apps and websites.
·
More than a dozen former Facebook security employees described the
company's tactics to CNBC, with several questioning the ethics of the company's
practices.
·
In early 2018, a Facebook user made a public threat on the
social network against one of the company's offices in Europe.
Facebook picked up the threat, pulled
the user's data and determined he was in the same country as the office he was
targeting. The company informed the authorities about the threat and directed
its security officers to be on the lookout for the user.
"He made a veiled threat that
'Tomorrow everyone is going to pay' or something to that effect," a former
Facebook security employee told CNBC.
The incident is representative of the
steps Facebook takes to keep its offices, executives and employees protected,
according to more than a dozen former Facebook employees who spoke with CNBC.
The company mines its social network for threatening comments, and in some
cases uses its products to track the location of people it believes present a
credible threat.
Several of the former employees
questioned the ethics of Facebook's security strategies, with one of them
calling the tactics "very Big Brother-esque."
Other former employees argue these
security measures are justified by Facebook's reach and the intense emotions it
can inspire. The company has 2.7 billion users across its services. That means
that if just 0.01 percent of users make a threat, Facebook is still dealing
with 270,000 potential security risks.
"Our physical security team
exists to keep Facebook employees safe," a Facebook spokesman said in a
statement. "They use industry-standard measures to assess and address
credible threats of violence against our employees and our company, and refer
these threats to law enforcement when necessary. We have strict processes
designed to protect people's privacy and adhere to all data privacy laws and
Facebook's terms of service. Any suggestion our onsite physical security team
has overstepped is absolutely false."
Facebook is unique in the way it uses
its own product to mine data for threats and locations of potentially dangerous
individuals, said Tim Bradley, senior consultant with Incident Management
Group, a corporate security consulting firm that deals with employee safety
issues. However, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's general
duty clause says that companies have to provide their employees with a
workplace free of hazards that could cause death or serious physical harm,
Bradley said.
"If they know there's a threat
against them, they have to take steps," Bradley said. "How they got
the information is secondary to the fact that they have a duty to protect
employees."
Making
the list
One of the tools Facebook uses to
monitor threats is a "be on lookout" or "BOLO" list, which
is updated approximately once a week. The list was created in 2008, an early
employee in Facebook's physical security group told CNBC. It now contains hundreds
of people, according to four former Facebook security employees who have left
the company since 2016.
Facebook notifies its security
professionals anytime a new person is added to the BOLO list, sending out a
report that includes information about the person, such as their name, photo,
their general location and a short description of why they were added.
In recent years, the security team even had a large monitor that displayed the
faces of people on the list, according to a photo CNBC has seen and two people
familiar, although Facebook says it no longer operates this monitor.
Other companies keep similar lists of
threats, Bradley and other sources said. But Facebook is unique because it can
use its own products to identify these threats and track the location of people
on the list.
Users who publicly threaten the
company, its offices or employees — including posting threatening comments in
response to posts from executives like CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl
Sandberg — are often added to the list. These users are typically described as
making "improper communication" or "threatening
communication," according to former employees.
The bar can be pretty low. While some
users end up on the list after repeated appearances on company property or long
email threats, others might find themselves on the BOLO list for saying
something as simple as "F--- you, Mark," "F--- Facebook" or
"I'm gonna go kick your a--," according to a former employee who
worked with the executive protection team. A different former employee who was
on the company's security team said there were no clearly communicated
standards to determine what kinds of actions could land somebody on the list,
and that decisions were often made on a case-by-case basis.
The Facebook spokesman disputed this,
saying that people were only added after a "rigorous review to determine
the validity of the threat."
Awkward
situations
Most people on the list do not know
they're on it. This sometimes leads to tense situations.
Several years ago, one Facebook user
discovered he was on the BOLO list when he showed up to Facebook's Menlo Park
campus for lunch with a friend who worked there, according to a former employee
who witnessed the incident.
The user checked in with security to
register as a guest. His name popped up right away, alerting security. He was
on the list. His issue had to do with messages he had sent to Zuckerberg,
according to a person familiar with the circumstances.
Soon, more security guards showed up
in the entrance area where the guest had tried to register. No one grabbed the
individual, but security guards stood at his sides and at each of the doors
leading in and out of that entrance area.
Eventually, the employee showed up
mad and demanded that his friend be removed from the BOLO list. After the
employee met with Facebook's global security intelligence and investigations
team, the friend was removed from the list — a rare occurrence.
"No person would be on BOLO
without credible cause," the Facebook spokesman said in regard to this
incident.
Noah Berger
| Reuters The Facebook campus in Menlo Park, California.
It's not just users who find
themselves on Facebook's BOLO list. Many of the people on the list are former
Facebook employees and contractors, whose colleagues ask to add them when they
leave the company.
Some former employees are listed for
having a track record of poor behavior, such as stealing company equipment. But
in many cases, there is no reason listed on the BOLO description. Three people
familiar said that almost every Facebook employee who gets fired is added to
the list, and one called the process "really subjective." Another
said that contractors are added if they get emotional when their contracts are
not extended.
The Facebook spokesman countered that
the process is more rigorous than these people claim. "Former employees
are only added under very specific circumstances, after review by legal and HR,
including threats of violence or harassment."
The practice of adding former
employees to the BOLO list has occasionally created awkward situations for the
company's recruiters, who often reach out to former employees to fill openings.
Ex-employees have showed up for job interviews only to find out that they
couldn't enter because they were on the BOLO list, said a former security employee
who left the company last year.
"It becomes a whole big
embarrassing situation," this person said.
Tracked
by special request
Facebook has the capability to track
BOLO users' whereabouts by using their smartphone's location data collected
through the Facebook app, or their IP address collected through the company's
website.
Facebook only tracks BOLO-listed
users when their threats are deemed credible, according to a former employee with
firsthand knowledge of the company's security procedures. This could include a
detailed threat with an exact location and timing of an attack, or a threat
from an individual who makes a habit of attending company events, such as the
Facebook shareholders' meeting. This former employee emphasized Facebook could
not look up users' locations without cause.
When a credible threat is detected,
the global security operations center and the global security intelligence and
investigations units make a special request to the company's information
security team, which has the capabilities to track users' location information.
In some cases, the tracking doesn't go very far -- for instance, if a BOLO user
made a threat about a specific location but their current location shows them
nowhere close, the tracking might end there.
But if the BOLO user is nearby, the
information security team can continue to monitor their location periodically
and keep other security teams on alert.
Depending on the threat, Facebook's
security teams can take other actions, such as stationing security guards,
escorting a BOLO user off campus or alerting law enforcement.
Robyn Beck |
AFP | Getty Images street sign reading 'Hacker Way' is seen in the parking lot
of the Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, California.
Facebook's information security team
has tracked users' locations in other safety-related instances, too.
In 2017, a Facebook manager alerted
the company's security teams when a group of interns she was managing did not
log into the company's systems to work from home. They had been on a camping
trip, according to a former Facebook security employee, and the manager was
concerned about their safety.
Facebook's information security team
became involved in the situation and used the interns' location data to try and
find out if they were safe. "They call it 'pinging them', pinging their
Facebook accounts," the former security employee recalled.
After the location data did not turn
up anything useful, the information security team then kept digging and learned
that the interns had exchanged messages suggesting they never intended to come
into work that day — essentially, they had lied to the manager. The information
security team gave the manager a summary of what they had found.
"There was legit concern about
the safety of these individuals," the Facebook spokesman said. "In
each isolated case, these employees were unresponsive on all communication
channels. There's a set of protocols guiding when and how we access employee
data when an employee goes missing."
Safety
first
While the company is aggressive about
dealing with potential threats, the risks are real. Just in recent weeks,
Facebook had to deal with a with bomb threat against the company's Menlo Park
campus and with an employee getting "swatted" -- that's when an
attacker calls in a false emergency to get police to send an armed SWAT team to
somebody's home, a prank with potentially fatal results.
One person pointed to an incident in
2015 where the BOLO list was essential. Facebook's security teams recognized
the license plate of a suspicious car that was loitering on the company's
campus, said a former Facebook physical security employee who left the company
in 2016.
The Facebook security guards kept
watch on the individual until Menlo Park Police Department officers showed up,
the former employee said.
They eventually arrested the driver
on charges of indecent exposure for public masturbation, according to a public
records request confirming the incident.
- Get link
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment