Facebook, Snapchat Deals Produce Meager Results for News Outlets
Facebook, Snapchat Deals Produce Meager Results for News
Outlets
by Gerry Smith January 24, 2017, 9:38 AM PST
Newspapers and other media outlets are struggling to make
money from their partnerships with tech giants like Facebook and Snapchat,
raising concerns over their business models in a news landscape increasingly
dominated by social media platforms.
Some publishers are scaling back on Facebook Inc.’s
Instant Articles program, in which they host stories directly on the
social-media company’s platform instead of their own websites so they load
faster on phones, according to a report by Digital Content Next, a trade group.
Media companies are frustrated that Facebook restricts
the number and type of ads in Instant Articles, making it harder for them to
make as much money as they can selling ads on their own websites, where they
can better target readers, said the group, whose members include the New York
Times, the Washington Post and ESPN. Bloomberg News, a unit of Bloomberg LP, is
also a member of the group.
Digital Content Next found that 17 of its members
generated an average of $7.7 million in the first half of 2016 from third-party
platforms, or 14 percent of their total digital revenue. Publishers still
“express deep ambivalence” about Facebook’s commitment to helping them make
money on the social media platform, the report said.
“On the most basic level, publishers are being
disintermediated, losing their relationship with their audiences, and they fear
that Facebook will further encroach on their traditional businesses,” the
report said.
Facebook and Twitter declined to comment. Snap Inc.
didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Facebook has struggled with its growing role as a
distributor of news to its 1.79 billion users, and has been criticized for not
doing more to curb the spread of misinformation on its site. As part of its
latest outreach, Facebook is embarking on a project that includes stronger
partnerships with media companies, greater support for local news and better
efforts to educate users to avoid hoaxes.
Facebook also plans to let more publishers insert ads
into Facebook Live videos and recently began letting media companies post
branded content, or ads created by publishers.
Still, the Digital Content Next report lays bare the
hesitance felt by media companies as they try to reach audiences that get their
news from social media. While working with Facebook or Snap helps them reach
bigger and younger audiences, they’re publishing their work on third-party
platforms instead of their own websites, and risk losing out on valuable
advertising and subscription opportunities.
Some publishers have also started to put less emphasis on
Facebook Live, in which media companies create live video that’s hosted on the
social media platform. Facebook has paid a select few media companies to
produce Facebook Live videos. While some outlets have started testing ads in
Facebook Live videos, others express concern over Facebook’s “lack of success
in creating large-scale audiences around live events,” Digital Content Next
said. The group concluded that, for many publishers, Facebook Live “has yet to
scale or prove a revenue model.”
Several media companies have dedicated staff to create
content for Snapchat, hoping to reach younger audiences that use it. Yet so
far, Snapchat “holds little to no short-term financial interest” for
publishers. Snapchat recently changed its model from splitting ad sales with
publishers to paying them a licensing fee. The new licensing model “may
translate into a limited upside for monetization by publishers,” the report
found.
Comments
Post a Comment