Scientists use stem cells from frogs to build first living robots
Scientists use stem cells from frogs to build first living robots
Researchers
foresee myriad benefits for humanity, but also acknowledge ethical issues
Ian
Sample Science editor Mon 13 Jan 2020 15.00 EST Last modified on Mon 13 Jan
2020 15.26 EST
Be
warned. If the rise of the robots comes to pass, the apocalypse may be a more
squelchy affair than science fiction writers have prepared us for.
Researchers
in the US have created the first living machines by assembling cells from
African clawed frogs into tiny robots that move around under their own steam.
One
of the most successful creations has two stumpy legs that propel it along on
its “chest”. Another has a hole in the middle that researchers turned into a
pouch so it could shimmy around with miniature payloads.
“These
are entirely new lifeforms. They have never before existed on Earth,” said
Michael Levin, the director of the Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University
in Medford, Massachusetts. “They are living, programmable organisms.”
Roboticists
tend to favour metal and plastic for their strength and durability, but Levin
and his colleagues see benefits in making robots from biological tissues. When
damaged, living robots can heal their wounds, and once their task is done they
fall apart, just as natural organisms decay when they die.
Their
unique features mean that future versions of the robots might be deployed to
clean up microplastic pollution in the oceans, locate and digest toxic
materials, deliver drugs in the body or remove plaque from artery walls, the
scientists say.
“It’s
impossible to know what the applications will be for any new technology, so we
can really only guess,” said Joshua Bongard, a senior researcher on the team at
the University of Vermont.
The
robots, which are less than 1mm long, are designed by an “evolutionary
algorithm” that runs on a supercomputer. The program starts by generating
random 3D configurations of 500 to 1,000 skin and heart cells. Each design is
then tested in a virtual environment, to see, for example, how far it moves
when the heart cells are set beating. The best performers are used to spawn
more designs, which themselves are then put through their paces.
Because
heart cells spontaneously contract and relax, they behave like miniature
engines that drive the robots along until their energy reserves run out. The
cells have enough fuel inside them for the robots to survive for a week to 10
days before keeling over.
The
scientists waited for the computer to churn out 100 generations before picking
a handful of designs to build in the lab. They used tweezers and cauterising
tools to sculpt early-stage skin and heart cells scraped from the embryos of
African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis. The source of the cells led the
scientists to call their creations “xenobots”.
Writing
in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers
describe how they set the robots loose in dishes of water to keep the frog
cells alive. Some crept along in straight lines, while others looped around in
circles or teamed up with others as they moved around.
“These
are very small, but ultimately the plan is to make them to scale,” said Levin.
Xenobots might be built with blood vessels, nervous systems and sensory cells,
to form rudimentary eyes. By building them out of mammalian cells, they could
live on dry land.
Sam
Kriegman, a PhD student on the team at the University of Vermont, acknowledged
that the work raised ethical issues, particularly given that future variants
could have nervous systems and be selected for cognitive capability, making
them more active participants in the world. “What’s important to me is that
this is public, so we can have a discussion as a society and policymakers can
decide what is the best course of action.”
He
was less concerned about xenobots posing any threat to humankind. “If you watch
the video, it’s hard to fear that these things are taking over any time soon,”
he said.
But
the work aims to achieve more than just the creation of squidgy robots. “The
aim is to understand the software of life,” Levin said. “If you think about
birth defects, cancer, age-related diseases, all of these things could be
solved if we knew how to make biological structures, to have ultimate control over
growth and form.”
The
research is funded by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s
lifelong learning machines programme, which aims to recreate biological
learning processes in machines.
Thomas
Douglas, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical
Ethics, said: “There are interesting ethical questions about the moral status
of these xenobots. At what point would they become beings with interests that
ought to be protected? I think they’d acquire moral significance only if they
included neural tissue that enabled some kind of mental life, such as the
ability to experience pain.
“But
some are more liberal about moral status. They think that all living creatures
have interests that should be given some moral consideration. For these people,
difficult questions could arise about whether these xenobots should be
classified as living creatures or machines.”
Comments
Post a Comment