High-performing robots demoralize human co-workers...
Here’s what robots destroy when they compete with humans
A new study has something to say about the toll of
workplace automation
By ANDREW KESHNER REPORTER Mar 16, 2019 4:24 p.m. ET
Robots are jerks.
That’s according to the demoralized humans who played
against the machines for money in a recent Cornell University-led experiment
shedding light on what can happen to worker’s drive in an increasingly
automated workplace.
When humans unsuccessfully vied against a robot arm for
cash prizes, participants ended up viewing themselves as less competent, didn’t
try as hard, and tended to dislike the automated appendage that bested them,
the researchers found.
“I felt very stressed competing with the robot,” one
participant admitted. “In some rounds, I kept seeing the robot’s score
increasing out of the corner of my eye, which was extremely nerve-racking
[sic].”
Another said in “some rounds the robot would go slower
and that’s when I started going faster.”
“It was obvious when the robot was ’going easy’ on me,”
according to another person.
The task was counting how often the letter G showed in a
list of characters, and then putting the corresponding number of blocks in a
bin. Awards were given through a lottery system tied to the human and robot
scores, so that the player with better scores had better odds at winning.
On the whole, Cornell University and Hebrew University of
Jerusalem researchers determined the 61 people involved “liked a low-performing
competitor robot more than a high-performing one, even though they considered
the latter to be more competent.”
The study was the first to bring experts in both behavioral
economics and robotics to see how a machine’s performance influences the
reactions of the humans competing alongside the robot. The study noted it used
an off-the-shelf WidowX Mark II as the mechanized competitor. They said the
results supported behavioral economic theories of “loss aversion,” where people
slacken their efforts in the face of defeat.
While participants might have been just counting letters
and putting blocks in bins — a task researchers acknowledged was “tedious” —
they said the findings have serious implications.
There are already many places where robots and humans
work next to each other on jobs that are similar or the same, assistant
professor Guy Hoffman of Cornell’s Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering noted. Cashiers scanning products next to automatic check-out
devices is one example, and delivery robots scooting around with
worker-operated forklifts is another, he said.
The study provides more insight on the big issue of
automation in the workplace.
The Brookings Institution estimated earlier this year
that 36 million American workers, including cooks, waiters, office clerks and
short-haul truckers, faced a “high exposure” to automation, making a pink slip
a real possibility. Robots powered by current technology could do at least 70%
of their job duties, the report said.
There’s anxiety over the consequences of automation and
artificial intelligence. It’s possible there’s a link between a person’s poor
health and their worries that robots would render them jobless, according to
October findings from Ball State University and Villanova University
researchers.
President Donald J. Trump brought up his own concerns
Tuesday, not about automation, but creeping computer overcomplexity in the
context of the recent Ethiopian Airlines crash of a Boeing 737 MAX 8. Trump
tweeted, “pilots are no longer needed, but rather computer scientists from MIT.
I see it all the time in many products. Always seeking to go one unnecessary
step further, when often old and simpler is far better.”
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
Airplanes are
becoming far too complex to fly. Pilots are no longer needed, but rather
computer scientists from MIT. I see it all the time in many products. Always
seeking to go one unnecessary step further, when often old and simpler is far
better. Split second decisions are....
7:00 AM - Mar 12, 2019
Another view is that workplace automation holds plenty of
promise.
When Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New
York, spoke this past weekend at the SXSW Conference in Austin, Texas this
weekend, she told an audience, “We should not be haunted by the specter of
being automated out of work. …We should be excited by that.”
The reason for the lack of enthusiasm, according to
Ocasio-Cortez, “is because we live in a society where if you don’t have a job,
you are left to die. And that is, at its core, our problem.”
Hoffman, the Cornell professor who was a senior author of
the study, said workers’ heart and souls need to be factored into the equation
when it comes to calling a robot a co-worker.
“While it may be tempting to design such robots for
optimal productivity, engineers and managers need to take into consideration
how the robots’ performance may affect the human workers’ effort and attitudes
toward the robot and even toward themselves,” he said.
Comments
Post a Comment