U.S. Supreme Court Pulls the Plug on Aereo's Streaming TV Service
U.S. Supreme Court Pulls the Plug on Aereo's Streaming TV
Service
By Pete Williams First published June 25th 2014, 7:13 am
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt a potentially
fatal blow to Aereo, an Internet service that allows customers to watch
broadcast TV programs on mobile devices.
Launched a year ago in New York and then extended to 10
other U.S. cities, it allows customers to watch over-the-air TV programs on a
smartphone, tablet, or computer for as little as $8 a month. Selections can be
viewed live or recorded for later viewing.
Shortly after the service was launched, the nation's
major broadcast networks filed a lawsuit claiming that Aereo illegally
retransmited their programs without paying for them. The court ruled against
Aereo by a vote of 6-3.
Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the majority,
stressed that it was a limited decision that will not “discourage the emergence
or use of different kinds of technologies.”
NBC Universal, the parent company of NBC News, was among
the challengers.
Lower federal courts issued contradictory rulings on
Aereo's legality. At the heart of the case was a provision of federal law that
applies to the public performance of copyrighted works.
The law regulates the transmission of a TV program
"to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the members of
the public capable of receiving the performance or display receive it in the
same place or in separate places and at the same time or at different
times."
Aereo argued that it was not covered by the law because
of the way its system was designed: when a user chose a program to watch, a
single micro antenna, about the size of a penny, was assigned to receive the
chosen station. The signal was sent to a sector of a video recorder dedicated
to that choice and then streamed to the customer.
For that reason, the company said, it does not create a
public performance. Even if thousands of users were watching the same program,
Aereo said, it createsd thousands of individual performances.
But the broadcasters said the test of the copyright law
was "whether an alleged infringer is transmitting a performance to the
public, not whether multiple people are capable of receiving each
transmission."
The Obama administration sided with the broadcasters but
urged the justices to rule narrowly and not "call into question the
legitimacy of innovative technologies that allow consumers to use the Internet
to store, hear, and view their own lawfully acquired copies of copyrighted
works."
Billions of dollars were in play. For Aereo, the future
of the company was at stake. Broadcasters feared a ruling in favor of Aereo
could undercut the legal foundation requiring cable and satellite services to
pay copyright fees to carry network programs.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-supreme-court-pulls-plug-aereos-streaming-tv-service-n140486
Comments
Post a Comment