Oracle Is Leading Anti-Amazon Lobby on Pentagon Cloud Bid
Oracle Is Leading Anti-Amazon Lobby on Pentagon Cloud Bid
Microsoft, IBM, Dell, HPE are said to be involved in
effort
Initiative aims to ensure contract goes to multiple firms
By Naomi Nix, Ben Grody, and Bill Allison April 13, 2018,
11:24 AM PDT
Oracle Corp. is leading a campaign in Washington to
prevent Amazon.com Inc. from winning a lucrative Defense Department computing
contract that’ll be awarded in coming months, according to three people
familiar with the matter.
The Oracle-led effort relies on a loose coalition of
technology companies also seeking a slice of the Pentagon work, including
Microsoft Corp. and International Business Machines Corp., said the people, who
described the matter on condition of anonymity. Dell Technologies Inc. and
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. are also participating, said one of the people.
Their goal is to make sure that the award process is
opened up to more than one company and unseat Amazon as the front-runner for
the multibillion-dollar deal. As part of the campaign, the people said, Oracle
is holding regular calls with tech allies, courting trade and mainstream media
and lobbying lawmakers, defense officials and the White House.
The tech companies are jockeying for a piece of the
Pentagon’s cloud business, which will provide a rich revenue stream and give
the winner an edge in government cloud computing. Oracle has long-term
contracts with many departments that use its flagship database to store
information on their own systems. As the agencies look to switch to cloud
computing and eye market-leader Amazon, Oracle’s traditional revenue sources
could be under threat. Oracle has tried to protect its database business by
offering cloud services of its own, but has come late to that market.
The Pentagon has said it intends to move the department’s
technology needs -- 3.4 million users and 4 million devices -- to the cloud,
indicating the massive size of the award. Pentagon officials, including Defense
Secretary Jim Mattis, have repeatedly said no decision about the
winner-take-all contract has been pre-made and that bids will be considered on
their merits, with an award to a company or a team of companies expected in
September. But Amazon’s dominant market share in the cloud-contracting business
is seen by many analysts as giving it a significant advantage in the
competition.
Oracle’s Catz Is Said to Talk Amazon Contract Row With
Trump
“Of course Oracle is interested in competing for the DoD
cloud contract and we are equally interested in the mission success of the
DoD," said Oracle’s Senior Vice President Ken Glueck in a statement. The
best approach "is to have an open competition, allowing DoD to choose from
many competing, innovative, modern, secure cloud architectures,” Glueck said.
IBM said in a statement it has been advocating for a
multi-cloud approach for months, without commenting on whether it’s involved in
an Oracle-led coalition.
‘Fair and Open’
Pentagon acquisition chief Ellen Lord said the
competition is fair and open and that the department continues to have multiple
cloud contracts.
"No decisions have been made and we are working with
a variety of companies," Lord said. "I see no focus toward one
company whatsoever."
Amazon, Microsoft and HPE declined to comment. Dell said
it competes with Oracle on hardware products but collaborates to make sure
their products can be used together, and declined to comment about whether it’s
working with an Oracle group.
Trump Broadsides
The battle over the Pentagon work is unfolding behind
closed doors as Amazon faces withering broadsides from President Donald Trump.
Trump has assailed the company and its founder Jeff Bezos in a series of tweets
and public statements that escalated in late March, criticizing its delivery
contract with the U.S. Postal Service and its tax practices. The attacks have
raised speculation that Trump’s true concern is Bezos’s ownership of The
Washington Post, which aggressively and critically covers him and his
administration. Thursday night, Trump ordered the creation of a task force to
review USPS’s business practices.
While Trump has used his Twitter account to press for
lower costs for weapons systems such as Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35 and Boeing
Co.’s new Air Force One planes, any attempt to intervene in a contract
competition pitting rival companies would be unprecedented.
It also would provide losing bidders with grounds to
challenge an award through the Government Accountability Office and the courts,
which would be likely to unearth emails, phone records or memos from
bureaucrats documenting the interference.
Washington Influence
While Oracle’s $187 billion market value is less than a
third of Amazon’s, it punches way above its weight in Washington, where it has
a team of seasoned policy officials and personal relationships that go all the
way to the top.
Trump personally ordered the Justice Department to hire
Oracle’s Ezra Cohen-Watnick to advise Attorney General Jeff Sessions on
national security matters, according to people familiar with the matter.
Cohen-Watnick went to Oracle in August after leaving the National Security
Council, where he had been caught up in a controversy over the release of
intelligence material to a member of Congress, according to people familiar
with the matter.
Glueck has led Oracle’s government affairs shop in
Washington for more than 20 years while the company sparred with other
companies in the capital, including funding investigations into Microsoft
during its antitrust trial and more recently supporting anti-sex trafficking
legislation that was initially opposed by tech trade groups representing
Alphabet Inc.’s Google, among other internet platforms.
Last year, the company brought on Vice President Mike
Pence’s former chief of staff and longtime aide Josh Pitcock to be its vice
president of government affairs. Former Hill staffers Joel Hinzman and Jason
Mahler have been with Oracle since 2003 and 2010, respectively.
Trump Supporters
Oracle’s Co-Chief Executive Officer Safra Catz was an
early supporter of Trump, and days after he won the election, Catz visited the
president-elect at Trump Tower in New York and subsequently served on the
executive committee of his transition team. Trump’s inner circle also had shown
interest in Catz and spoken with her about the positions of U.S. Trade
Representative and the Director of National Intelligence, according to people
familiar with the matter.
Catz also joined the American Technology Council, a White
House effort headed by onetime Microsoft finance chief Chris Liddell to seek
the private sector’s input on modernizing the federal government’s technology
among other issues.
White House Dinner
On April 4, during a private dinner at the White House,
where Catz was a guest of venture capitalist Peter Thiel, a longtime Trump
supporter, she criticized the bidding process for the cloud contract, complaining
that it seemed tilted in Amazon’s favor, according to people familiar with the
matter.
Trump listened and assured her the contract competition
would be fair, but made no indication he’d interfere in the bidding, the people
said. Catz didn’t emphasize that her company is competing with Amazon for the
award, the people added.
While it’s best-known for being the world’s largest
online retailer, Amazon also operates Amazon Web Services, the market’s top
cloud-computing business. AWS has already won a similar contract with the
Central Intelligence Agency, showing it can manage sensitive government
information. That has contributed to making Amazon the leading contender to win
the Pentagon cloud deal that may be as long as 10 years.
While Mattis told lawmakers at a hearing on Thursday that
"it is a fair and open competition for anyone who wants to come in,"
he also praised the CIA’s cloud project run by Amazon.
"We’ve examined what CIA achieved in terms of
availability of data" and "also security of their data, and it’s very
impressive," Mattis said at the hearing.
Lobbying Windfall
The battle for a piece of the contract could be a
windfall for K Street. Amazon spent $12.8 million on lobbyists in 2017,
according to federal disclosures filed with Congress, but faces well-funded
challengers. Oracle said it spent nearly $9 million. Microsoft spent $8.6
million, IBM spent $5.3 million, HP Enterprise $5 million and Dell $4 million,
disclosures show.
The anti-Amazon group has already claimed some
significant victories, including Congress’s directive to the Pentagon in the
$1.3 trillion spending bill passed in March to explain why it’s planning a
single source award for the cloud contract, those people said. While the people
attributed the provision to lobbying by Oracle and other companies, another
person involved in the process said the language reflects lawmakers’ own
concerns about the competition.
Another win was the Pentagon’s decision last month to
pare back a nearly $1 billion dollar cloud contract awarded to REAN Cloud LLC.,
a cloud migration company most of whose clients work with AWS, after Oracle
formally protested the bid.
Other Opponents
In the meantime, other Amazon opponents have emerged,
including a conservative columnist and activist named Seton Motley.
Motley said he launched an advertising campaign in the
New York Post goading Trump not to let the Pentagon give the cloud contract
solely to Amazon. The campaign, which has a companion website, shows photos of
Bezos laughing and chatting with Mattis with a fictional letter from Bezos
telling Trump that the contract “will really help my many efforts to oppose
your Administration’s policies.” Motley said he’s paying for the ads himself
and has had no contacts with Amazon’s competitors.
Amazon is seeking allies of its own in the federal
procurement sector. Earlier this year, Amazon hosted an event with several
technology companies to propose starting a new coalition aimed at helping the
government find commercial solutions for its technology needs, according to two
people familiar with the event.
Amazon hasn’t made any announcement about the effort and
didn’t respond to requests for comment about the initiative.
— With assistance by Anthony Capaccio, Nico Grant, and
Jennifer Jacobs
Comments
Post a Comment