Where does Uber’s $35 billion deal with Didi leave Lyf
Where does Uber’s $35 billion deal with Didi leave Lyft?
The sorrow of being Number Two
By Andrew J. Hawkins on August 1, 2016 01:27 pm
Uber used to have a big problem in China: it was
hemorrhaging money — some reports put it at $1 billion a year — in its fierce
battle with Didi Chuxing over the fastest growing ride-hail market in the
world. This was good news for Lyft, Uber’s biggest competitor in the US,
because the more Uber was focused on China, the less it could afford to worry
about things here at home. But now Uber has solved its problem in China by
allowing its operations there to be merged with Didi. And this could be really
bad news for Lyft.
First of all, some analysts speculate that Uber’s deal
with Didi actually gives it a small ownership stake in Lyft, since Didi
invested $100 million in Lyft as part of a global partnership between the two
companies (and two other Asian ride-hail apps, Grab and Ola) that was announced
last December. “Uber will own a chunk of a chunk of Lyft,” Matt Levine writes
in Bloomberg View, “in a big happy family of interlinked ride-sharing.”
Follow
Christopher Mims ✔ @mims
Didi invested $100 million in Lyft.
Uber now owns 20% of Didi.
Does that mean Uber now owns part of Lyft?
8:14 AM - 1 Aug 2016
24 24
Retweets 37 37 likes
Except things aren’t so happy in the rough-and-tumble
world of ride-sharing. Uber and Lyft are locked in a no-holds-barred struggle
to lock down as many customers as possible, with the assumption that most
people could care less about the differences between the two and just want to
use whichever is cheapest. As such, it’s been a race to the bottom, price-wise,
and so far Uber is winning.
According to a recent analysis, Lyft only captured 5
percent of all black-car transactions in the second quarter of 2016, compared
to Uber’s 72.5 percent. But over the last two years, Lyft has grown at a faster
rate than Uber, 176 percent compared to 145 percent.
It’s unclear where the deal between Uber and Didi will
leave Lyft. One of the outcomes of the partnership between Didi and Lyft was to
enable Didi customers to seamlessly summon a car through Lyft’s app while
traveling in the US, and vice-versa. That happened last April. But now that
Uber and Didi are hopelessly intertwined — Uber has become one of Didi’s
largest investors, and Didi gets a stake in Uber’s operations in the US — it’s
difficult to see where this leads things for Lyft. Spokespersons for Uber,
Didi, and Lyft did not respond to requests for comment.
“BEING NUMBER TWO IN SUCH A BIG MARKET IS AN EXPENSIVE
PROPOSITION”
It’s more than just lost business. The Uber-Didi deal
could pose a much more existential threat to Lyft, which so far has made the
best out of being the Number Two ride-hailing app in the US.
“The China merger could even be a sign of things to come
in the US since it's clear that being number two in such a big market is an
expensive proposition,” said Harry Campbell, who blogs and records a podcast as
The Rideshare Guy. “In the US, Lyft is in a tough spot since they're doing a
fraction of the rides of Uber yet aren't making much headway in regards to
market share. Now that Uber doesn't need to worry about China, Uber will be
able to put even more focus on their key markets like the US and maybe even
force a Lyft merger or sale.”
If it comes to that, who would buy Lyft? The most obvious
candidate is General Motors, which last year invested $500 million in the
pink-mustachioed company for the purposes of developing a fleet of on-demand,
self-driving cars. It was recently reported that those robot taxis will be
tested on the road this year, thanks to GM’s recent acquisition of autonomous
car startup Cruise Automation last March. Till then, the two companies are also
working hand-in-glove on a car rental service targeted at Lyft drivers. If GM
just bought Lyft, it could make things for both companies a lot easier.
Brian Solomon from Forbes asked this question last month,
while noting that Lyft recently hired Qatalyst Partners to explore new
investments — or a potential buyer. But Solomon also raises an excellent point:
does GM really need to expose itself to Lyft’s losses? Now that Uber and Didi
have called a cease fire, that question and many others are sure to rise to the
surface in the months ahead.
Comments
Post a Comment