US court says cops don't need a warrant for cell location data
US court says cops don't need a warrant for cell location
data
The case reverses a decision from last year — which may
push the case into the hands of the Supreme Court.
By Zack Whittaker for Zero Day | May 31, 2016 -- 19:38
GMT (12:38 PDT)
Police do not need a warrant to determine a suspect's
location based off cell-site information, an appeals court has ruled.
In a 12-3 vote, the Fourth Circuit appeals court
overturned a notable decision last year, arguing that the government can get
the information from a third-party, which doesn't violate a person's Fourth
Amendment right to protection against unwarranted searches and seizures.
The case will be a bump in the road for privacy
advocates, who have for the past few years tried to clarify the use of
location-based data collected from cell phones and GPS devices. The Supreme
Court has yet to take up a case that would definitively rule on the matter.
In Tuesday's ruling, Judge Diana Motz said obtaining
cell-site location data doesn't violated those protections because the data was
already being shared with a person's cell service provider -- a requirement
that helps the phone to function.
"Anyone who has stepped outside to 'get a signal,'
or has warned a caller of a potential loss of service before entering an
elevator, understands, on some level, that location matters," Motz wrote.
"Whenever he expects his phone to work, he is
permitting -- indeed, requesting -- his service provider to establish a
connection between his phone and a nearby cell tower," she said.
Not all the justices on the court agreed.
Judge James Wynn, who voted in the minority, said in his
dissent that should a suspect have any "vague awareness that their
location affects the number of 'bars' on their phone," that person can't
know that such data is being collected and stored by the carrier.
Comments
Post a Comment