Eye on safety, California sets rules for self-driving cars
Eye on safety, California sets rules for self-driving
cars
Originally published December 16, 2015 at 11:00 pm
By JUSTIN PRITCHARD The Associated Press
LOS ANGELES (AP) — California regulators have unveiled a
roadmap that would let consumers begin using self-driving cars, though
manufacturers would have to prove the emerging technology is safe before a
licensed driver could get chauffeured around town.
The approach California’s Department of Motor Vehicles
offered Wednesday in precedent-setting draft regulations is cautious, though it
does allow that Californians could be behind the wheel of a self-driving car by
2017.
Among other safety-related requirements, the cars must
have a steering wheel, and a licensed driver must be ready to take over if the
machine fails.
Google, which is pushing to get cars without a steering
wheel or pedals to consumers, expressed “grave disappointment” with the rules,
which the tech giant said would slow deployment of technology with huge
life-saving potential.
Though no manufacturer has said it thinks the cars are
ready just yet, at least a dozen are developing the technology. Google has
suggested a model could be ready for limited use sooner than the public
expects. In September, the safety chief of its self-driving car project, Ron
Medford, said the technology is “close to working pretty damn well.”
California’s go-slow approach could benefit Texas, which
this summer emerged as a competitor in the deployment of self-driving cars when
officials in the capital city of Austin welcomed Google prototypes for
company-sponsored testing.
“Given the potential risks associated with deployment of
such a new technology, DMV believes that manufacturers need to obtain more
experience in testing driverless vehicles on public roads prior to making this
technology available to the general public,” the agency said in a written
summary of its draft regulations.
Those draft rules set out how the DMV wants to move
beyond the current small-scale testing of prototypes on public roads. The DMV
can change the rules over the coming months before they are finalized, and the
industry is sure to lobby for significant changes.
That process will further delay rules that were due at
the start of 2015.
There are no comprehensive federal rules addressing the
technology, and as the largest auto market in the U.S., rules in California are
a landmark in the development of self-driving technology.
Under California’s framework, manufacturers would receive
a permit for three years, during which time consumers could lease the cars but
manufacturers would be required to keep tabs on how safely they are driving and
report that performance to the state.
Before the DMV grants that three-year permit, an
independent certifier would need to verify a manufacturer’s safety assurances.
Google and traditional automakers advocated for manufacturer self-certification
of safety, the standard for other cars.
Drivers would need special, manufacturer-provided
training, then get a special certification on their licenses. If a car breaks
the law, the driver would be responsible.
Though the timeline for public access is squishy, in
principle the DMV could finalize the rules and a manufacturer could satisfy the
safety requirements as early as 2017.
That said, the draft rules surely will postpone the
technology’s rollout in California.
“This points to a very long slog ahead for not just
Google, but really other automakers as well,” said Bryant Walker Smith, a law
professor at the University of South Carolina who studies self-driving car
regulation. He added: “California’s proposed rules are fantastic news for
Texas.”
Austin’s mayoral spokesman Jason Stanford said his city’s
government already believes self-driving cars are “legal and safe” and is
“thrilled to host innovative ideas like this.”
California’s DMV has said it wanted regulations to
protect public safety, but not be so onerous that they would stifle development
of a technology that could prove safer than human drivers.
After all, cars that can safely drive themselves under
all conditions wouldn’t rely on drivers who may be drowsy, distracted, buzzed —
or unable to drive because of their age or a disability. Boosters say the
technology could prevent many of the more than 32,000 deaths on U.S. roads each
year.
The cars use a suite of sensors — including radar, lasers
and cameras — and onboard computers to drive.
Eleven companies already have permission to test on
California’s public roads, with Ford the latest addition. There have been
scattered collisions, nearly all involving Google cars. Those collisions have
been minor, and the tech giants says each has been caused by drivers of other
cars.
Google spokesman Johnny Luu said the company was “gravely
disappointed” by the draft regulations.
“Safety is our highest priority and primary motivator as
we do this,” he said in a written statement.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers industry group
was not publicly critical, perhaps because traditional automakers the group
represents are phasing in features such as automatic braking and cruise control
that adjusts to the speed of other vehicles — instead of jumping to a car that
drives itself, as Google envisions.
Meanwhile, a consumer group applauded the draft rules as
appropriately cautious.
The DMV “did exactly what they should do, which is put
the public safety first,” said John Simpson, privacy project director at
Consumer Watchdog and frequent Google critic.
Associated Press writer Paul J. Weber contributed from
Austin, Texas.
Comments
Post a Comment