Federal officials take
down 132 websites in 'Cyber Monday' crackdown
By Brendan Sasso - 11/26/12 12:20 PM ET
U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement and European officials seized 132 websites on Monday for
allegedly selling counterfeit merchandise in a coordinated crackdown timed to
coincide with the holiday shopping season.
It is the third straight
year that the government has seized websites on "Cyber Monday" — the
marketing term for the Monday after Thanksgiving, when many online retailers
offer steep discounts and promotions.
ICE's Homeland Security
Investigations unit coordinated with officials from Belgium, Denmark, France,
Romania, the United Kingdom and the European Police Office to take down the
sites.
"This operation is a
great example of the tremendous cooperation between ICE and our international
partners at the [Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center]," ICE
Director John Morton said in a statement. "Our partnerships enable us to
go after criminals who are duping unsuspecting shoppers all over the world.
This is not an American problem, it is a global one and it is a fight we must
win."
As part of the operation,
federal law enforcement officers made undercover purchases of products such as
sports jerseys, DVD players, clothing and jewelry from websites suspected of
selling counterfeit products.
If the copyright holders
confirmed that the products were unauthorized, ICE obtained a court order to
shut down the sites.
Visitors to the websites
will now see only a banner informing them of the seizure and warning them that
copyright infringement is a federal crime. ICE did not name the targeted sites.
The crackdown, named
"Cyber Monday 3," is part of ICE's Operation In Our Sites, a program
that has now seized a total of 1,630 alleged pirate sites.
Some lawmakers have
expressed concern that Operation In Our Sites violates the due process rights
of website owners.
Reps. Zoe Lofgren
(D-Calif.), Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) wrote a letter in
August to the administration questioning whether overzealous enforcement has
stifled legitimate speech.
Under the current system,
the authorities confiscate the websites as asset forfeiture, much like police
might seize a drug dealer's car after arresting him. But some advocates argue
the website owners should have a chance to defend themselves before the site is
shut down.
Comments
Post a Comment