Judge "Disturbed" To Learn Google Tracks 'Incognito' Users, Demands Answers
Judge "Disturbed" To Learn Google Tracks 'Incognito' Users, Demands Answers
BY TYLER DURDEN SATURDAY, FEB 27, 2021 - 17:00
A US District Judge in San Jose, California says she was
"disturbed" over Google's data collection practices, after learning
that the company still collects and uses data from users
in its Chrome browser's so-called 'incognito' mode - and
has demanded an explanation "about what exactly Google does,"
according to Bloomberg.
In a class-action lawsuit that describes the company's private browsing claims as a "ruse" - and "seeks $5,000 in damages for each of the millions of people whose privacy has been compromised since June of 2016," US District Judge Lucy Koh said she finds it "unusual" that the company would make the "extra effort" to gather user data if it doesn't actually use the information for targeted advertising or to build user profiles.
Koh has a long history with the Alphabet Inc. subsidiary,
previously forcing the Mountain View, California-based company to disclose its
scanning of emails for the purposes of targeted advertising and profile
building.
In this
case, Google is
accused of relying on pieces of its code within websites that use its analytics
and advertising services to scrape users’ supposedly private browsing history
and send copies of it to Google’s servers. Google
makes it seem like private browsing mode gives users more control of their
data, Amanda Bonn, a lawyer representing users, told Koh. In reality, “Google
is saying there’s basically very little you can do to prevent us from
collecting your data, and that’s what you should assume we’re doing,” Bonn
said.
Andrew
Schapiro, a lawyer for Google, argued the company’s privacy policy “expressly
discloses” its practices. “The data collection at issue
is disclosed,” he said.Another lawyer for Google, Stephen Broome, said website owners who
contract with the company to use its analytics or other services are well aware
of the data collection described in the suit. -Bloomberg
Koh isn't buying it - arguing that the company is effectively
tricking users under the impression that their information is not being
transmitted to the company.
"I want a declaration from Google on what information
they’re collecting on users to the court’s website, and what that’s used
for," Koh demanded.
The case
is Brown v. Google, 20-cv-03664, U.S. District Court, Northern District of
California (San Jose), via Bloomberg.
Comments
Post a Comment