Facebook Creates Lobbying Group To Argue Big Tech Is "Essential To Free Speech"
Facebook Creates Lobbying Group
To Argue Big Tech Is "Essential To Free Speech"
by Tyler Durden Wed, 05/13/2020 - 12:20
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,
Facebook
is setting up an advocacy group in Washington DC with the sole aim of
preventing the US government from regulating the company. The lobbying group
will claim that big tech is (vomit bags at the ready) “essential to the future
of free speech.”
The details were revealed in a Washington Post report which
details how the group, to be called ‘American Edge’ will spend millions in
advertising and political greasing to prevent regulation.
The Post also states that the lobbying effort will involve
arguments that “strong restrictions imposed on tech giants could hurt US firms
and ultimately serve to aid their competitors, particularly in China.”
Confirming its involvement to the Post, Facebook claimed that
the lobbying group will “help build support for our industry.”
Facebook is desperate to avoid regulation because it would mean
an entire overhaul of its business structure.
The company is currently facing an antitrust probe in
addition to several lawsuits from
companies and individuals all over the world accusing
the social media network of politically motivated censorship.
Facebook has shown time after time that it is a politically
partisan organisation, and as such should be subject to oversight, critics have
argued.
Another member of the company’s new censorship
council is a pro-Muslim Brotherhood Yemeni
activist who became one of the faces of the Arab Spring
uprising in 2011.
These are the people who will be deciding
whether your Facebook posts violate the social media network’s increasingly
draconian rules.
Facebook has also recently been banning
‘misinformation’ about the coronavirus, as determined by someone who previously worked in the Wuhan
bio-lab.
Facebook’s
every move is designed to satiate a rabid obsession with controlling society.
The fact that the company is arguing it is defending free speech in doing so is
insidiously Orwellian.
Comments
Post a Comment